{"id":18721,"date":"2025-03-26T15:02:54","date_gmt":"2025-03-26T14:02:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.progressives-zentrum.org\/en\/?post_type=publication&p=18721"},"modified":"2025-10-29T14:20:50","modified_gmt":"2025-10-29T13:20:50","slug":"u-s-climate-policy-no-backlash-no-retreat","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/www.progressives-zentrum.org\/en\/publication\/u-s-climate-policy-no-backlash-no-retreat\/","title":{"rendered":"No Backlash, No Retreat"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n

This representative survey conducted by Das Progressive Zentrum, in collaboration with the Progressive Policy Institute and Georgetown University\u2019s Center for German and European Studies, provides new insights into public attitudes toward public investments and green transformation agendas in Germany and the U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Against a backdrop of political upheaval and economic uncertainty, the findings reveal how these dynamics shape public opinion. Despite setbacks for green economic transformation, public support for climate and economic policies remains remarkably stable, with no significant backlash against green agendas in either country. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Contrary to assumptions that Trump\u2019s victory signals a rejection of green policies, the findings show that a majority of Americans continue to support ambitious climate initiatives that promise economic opportunities. While Trump\u2019s \u201cAmerica First\u201d approach has led to the U.S. withdrawing from international agreements like the Paris Climate Accord, public opinion demonstrates that \u201cAmerica First\u201d does not equate to \u201cclimate second.\u201d Notably, 42% of Trump voters see economic potential in climate action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Germany, a similar trend emerges. Despite concerns about economic stagnation and declining competitiveness, almost half of respondents support substantial investment in the green transformation of the economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is also broad, cross-party backing for reforming the debt brake and increasing funding for economically disadvantaged regions, reflecting a shared recognition of the need to address regional inequalities and boost public investment in infrastructure, education, and innovation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In both countries, the cost of living and economic stability remain top concerns, underscoring the financial pressures faced by many. These findings highlight the importance of reframing green policies to emphasize tangible benefits, such as cost savings and job creation, to maintain public support.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Five Key Findings<\/h3>\n\n\n\n