Laura-Kristine Krause lays out four paths towards implementing and seizing the opportunities of digital democracy in Germany.
Liberal democracies in Europe and beyond are facing challenges, and so does the German democracy. In the debate on how to strengthen and revive democracy, digitalisation of the political sphere is predominantly seen as a threat to democratic discourse and not as an opportunity in Germany.
In this Discussion Paper Laura-Kristine Krause addresses the source of this paradox and offers a concept of digital democracy as a combination of the dimensions information, participation and transformation.
In urging to see digitalisation as a process reaching beyond the digitalisation of former analogue processes, it lays out four paths towards implementing and seising the opportunities of digital democracy in Germany.
I want to read this paper
About the author
Laura-Kristine Krause is Head of the Programme „Future of Democracy“ at Das Progressive Zentrum, a Berlin-based, independent think tank. Previously, she worked as a public affairs consultant in Berlin, focusing on the digital and financial sector. She is Co-Chair-woman of the grassroots think tank D64 – Center for Digital Progress and fellow of the 2017 Transatlantic Digital Debates. She published on digital policy, party reform, and women in politics.
About the Democracy Lab of Das Progressive Zentrum
The Democracy Lab is the platform for projects on innovating democracy at Das Progressive Zentrum. The Lab hosts, fosters, and connects projects that generate ideas and practical approaches on how to innovate liberal democracy and to enable political actors and institutions. The projects span different disciplines, countries, and regions and are realised in cooperation with a multitude of partner organizations.
The Democracy Lab deals with questions of digital democracy in the context of the project “Democracy 2025 – Democratic innovations for a changing society”, funded by the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth as part of the federal programme “Demokratie leben!”
250 Politikbegeisterte verfolgten die Bundestagswahl auf der überparteilichen „Für die Demokratie!“ Wahlparty des Progressiven Zentrums und seiner Partner. Als deutlich wurde, wie stark die AfD abschneiden würden, fassten die OrganisatorInnen einen überraschenden Entschluss.
Wie entstanden populistische Bewegungen in Frankreich, Italien und Deutschland? Und wie können Progressive die Oberhand zurückgewinnen? Acht Vorschläge.
The populist surge seems inextricably linked to the logic, workings, and structural transformation of the public sphere. Hence, in order to understand and counter the current fundamental attacks on our liberal democracies and pluralist-democratic values, we need to address a number of crucial questions in this regard. For example, how does the transformation and diversification of the media affect populism as well as feasible responses? And how should political and media actors deal with populists without either playing into the narrative of the „ignored outsider“ or giving them more attention than warranted by their political successes?
Why do we believe individuals to be rational decision-makers, even if behavioural economics proves this to be wrong? How can we trust free markets to yield the best results for our society? Because we are submitting to myths, claimed Tomas Björkman, author of the new book „Market Myth“ on a discussion at Das Progressive Zentrum
Gleich zu Jahresbeginn am Mittwoch, den 18. Januar 2017, fand in den Räumen des Progressiven Zentrums der dritte Rot-Grüne Dialog statt. In vertraulicher Runde mit insgesamt 30 Teilnehmenden, darunter überwiegend Mitglieder des Bundestages, wurden die Themen Flucht und Integration sowie zukünftige Machtoptionen diskutiert.
Die Ratlosigkeit der Linken ermöglicht den Triumph der Rechten. Fünf Thesen zur Wahl Donald Trumps
Mit Sicherheit wäre es auch schneller gegangen, aber immerhin: 315 Tage regierte Rajoy mit einer kommissarischen Regierung. Trotz seiner Wiederwahl verfügen die Konservativen über keine eigene Regierungsmehrheit. Es gilt, die Erwartungen zu dämpfen, denn der Dauerwahlkampf droht in die parlamentarischen Institutionen getragen zu werden.
The unexpected happened and we are still searching for an answer why it happened and what might be the adequate response. This essay attempts to look for the reasons of the current success of populists on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean and to face the challenge that is produced by this convergence.
Against the grave background of the populist surge and rising disenchantment with democratic politics, Das Progressive Zentrum launched the project Countering Populism and Political Disaffection. The first roundtable (of a total of three) took place on Wednesday, December 7, 2016.
In Italien, Frankreich und Holland stehen Abstimmungen an, deren Ausgang für die Zukunft der EU entscheidend sein kann. Die grassierende Hoffnung auf »mehr nationale Souveränität« ist trügerisch. Überhaupt nur mit enger Kooperation innerhalb der Union können Europas Nationen ihre Probleme noch lösen
Representatives of civil society and academics from Poland, Germany and other European countries joined a Polish-German seminar in Wroclaw on 20-21 October in search for answers to the question of what role civil society plays at the political scene in Europe today. It seems that nowadays the notion of Europe has been undermined by an economic crisis, followed by a humanitarian one, resulting from inability to handle of the influx of refugees in Europe. Fundamental European values are questioned. European political culture is currently in need of a new approach and civil engagement. It seems, however, that the notion of “civil society” needs redefinition per se to support European democracies. Radical and populist movements win popularity in many European countries, posing a threat to democratic order. Is the democratic order in danger? Is the pluralist political culture of Europe sustainable?
Hungary is commonly portrayed as one of the most Eurosceptic countries in the European Union. Paradoxically, however, the Hungarian public has by and large a positive image of the EU. How can this be explained? And how is the current refugee crisis affecting the EU-Hungarian relations?
Italy has a long history of populist parties. However, with the 5 Stars Movement a new, somewhat peculiar actor entered the scene. What form does its populism take, particularly in relation to the Northern League? And how does Italian populism compare to the recent rise of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in Germany?
Similarly to trends across Europe, populism and radical right-wing politics have become an inextricable part of the political landscape in Bulgaria. Yet, some characteristics render the Bulgarian case unique and highlight the rather different underpinnings compared to, on the surface, similar political phenomena in the East and the West.
Der Populismus hat derzeit Hochkonjunktur in Europa. Doch anstatt die Populisten zu verteufeln, sollten die etablierten Parteien aus ihrem Erfolg lernen. Nur so, können sie die Gunst der Wähler zurückgewinnen.
Während den Unionsparteien nur Symbolpolitik bleibt, hat die SPD die große Chance, sich als Ideengeber und Partei der vernünftigen Konzepte zu profilieren. Jetzt kommt es darauf an, einen stimmigen Zukunftsentwurf zu formulieren.
Paul Nolte argues that the United States and Europe are, for the first time in a long while, witnessing a strikingly similar political phenomenon of grave importance, namely populism as the „movement of the disaffected“. His analysis was presented at the roundtable „US 2016 Presidential Elections: Insights from the Campaign and Consequences for Europe“, which was jointly organised by the Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) and Das Progressive Zentrum, and which took place on Friday, July 1, 2016.